On the Use of Change in Tumor Size to Predict Survival in Clinical Oncology Studies: Toward a New Paradigm to Design and Evaluate Phase II Studies
- 1 August 2009
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Wiley in Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
- Vol. 86 (2) , 136-138
- https://doi.org/10.1038/clpt.2009.97
Abstract
Drug-independent models that link biomarker response to clinical end points are critical to support early (end of phase II) clinical decisions. In oncology, change in tumor size (a biomarker of drug effect evaluated in phase II) is linked to survival (a phase III end point) in some solid tumors. Change in tumor size can be used as a primary end point in the design and evaluation of phase II studies and in supporting go/no-go decisions and phase III study design.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Pharmacodynamic Model for the Time Course of Tumor Shrinkage by Gemcitabine + Carboplatin in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer PatientsClinical Cancer Research, 2008
- Recommended changes to oncology clinical trial design: Revolution or evolution?European Journal Of Cancer, 2008
- Design of Phase II Cancer Trials Using a Continuous Endpoint of Change in Tumor Size: Application to a Study of Sorafenib and Erlotinib in Non Small-Cell Lung CancerJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2007
- Model-based predictions of expected anti-tumor response and survival in phase III studies based on phase II data of an investigational agentJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2006
- Can the pharmaceutical industry reduce attrition rates?Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2004