Using Alcohol as a Standard to Assess the Degree of Impairment Induced by Sedative and Analgesic Drugs Used in Ambulatory Surgery
- 1 January 1995
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Anesthesiology
- Vol. 82 (1) , 53-59
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199501000-00008
Abstract
Background: There is a need for a standard by which to compare the degree of subjective and behavioral impairment caused by anesthetic drugs, because anesthesiologists may not be able to gauge how extreme or important a statistically significant change in psychomotor functioning is. This study examined the psychomotor and subjective effects of alcohol at blood concentrations equal or greater than 0.10% as a standard with which to compare those effects caused by sedative and analgesic agents commonly used in ambulatory surgery. Methods: Twelve healthy human volunteers (11 men and 1 nonpregnant woman), with an average age of 28 yr (range 24-34 yr) and an average alcohol consumption of four drinks per week, were selected in this institutional review board-approved study. Each subject was exposed to five drug conditions (70 mg/70 kg propofol intravenously, 2 mg/70 kg midazolam intravenously, 50 micrograms/70 kg fentanyl intravenously, 0.8 g/kg alcohol orally, and placebo orally and intravenously) in a double-blind randomized fashion over five weekly sessions. Testing was done at baseline and at different intervals until 240 min after drug administration. Testing included psychomotor performance (Maddox Wing, eye-hand coordination, auditory reaction time test, and digit symbol substitution test), subjective effects (strength of drug effect scale, drug liking scale, and visual analog scale), and short-term memory. Psychomotor performance was used as an index of objective impairment, and mood was used as an index of subjective impairment. Results: After consumption of the alcoholic beverage, a blood alcohol level of 0.11 +/- 0.003% (mean +/- SE) was obtained at 15 min after injection. The study drugs not only produced statistically significant impairment (i.e., impairment greater than that seen with placebo) but also, at one or more times after injection, produced impairment similar to that observed with alcohol at a blood alcohol concentration of 0.11%. Midazolam produced a similar degree of impairment to that of alcohol for a longer duration than did fentanyl and propofol. Conclusions: This study provides evidence that degree of impairment caused by sedative and analgesic drugs used in ambulatory surgery is similar to that obtained with a dose of alcohol that produces a blood alcohol concentration of 0.11%. We suggest that anesthesiologists can use alcohol as a standard by which to assess degree of impairment produced by drugs used for sedation/analgesia.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Subjective and behavioral responses to intravenous fentanyl in healthy volunteersPsychopharmacology, 1992
- Clinical Recovery and Psychomotor Function after Brief Anesthesia with Propofol or ThiopentalAnesthesiology, 1992
- Sedation and Recovery of Psychomotor Function After Intravenous Administration of Various Doses of Midazolam and DiazepamAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1992
- Evaluation of a New Computerized Psychomotor Test Battery: Effects of AlcoholBasic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, 1991
- Comparison of the Sedative Effects of Butorphanol and MidazolamAnesthesiology, 1991
- Alcohol and marijuana: Comparative dose effect profiles in humansPharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 1988
- EFFECTS OF ETHANOL ON PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCEBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1987
- Effects of acute exposure of toluene and methyl ethyl ketone on psychomotor performanceInternationales Archiv für Arbeitsmedizin, 1984
- Psychomotor function and psychoactive drugs.British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1980
- Measurement of Recovery from Outpatient General Anaesthesia with a Simple Ocular TestBMJ, 1970