Analysis of Prosthetic Femoral Heads Retrieved at Autopsy
- 1 January 1999
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
- Vol. 358 (358) , 223???234-34
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199901000-00027
Abstract
This study examined 24 prosthetic femoral heads retrieved at autopsy from patients with clinically and radiographically successful arthroplasties. Four alumina ceramic and 20 cobalt chrome heads in service for an average of 8.5 years were examined with a contact and a laser stylus profilometer. The authors documented general increases in surface roughness of the cobalt chrome and ceramic femoral heads attributable to in vivo articulation and also observed wear polishing around the apical region of the cobalt chrome heads. The roughness of the prosthetic femoral heads was compared with the polyethylene wear in the matching liners. No relationship was found between femoral head roughness values and polyethylene wear or component duration in situ. The only variable related to the pattern of head roughness and polyethylene wear was the presence of embedded particle debris in the polyethylene liner. Roughness parameters for cobalt chrome heads without embedded debris in the polyethylene liner were fairly uniform around the head. Roughness values, which were higher for heads associated with debris, had a decreasing gradient of surface roughness from the equator to the apex. In addition, the polyethylene wear rate for cups with embedded particle debris in the liner was significantly greater than the wear rate for cups without embedded debris. This study also showed a strong correlation between surface roughness values measured with the contact profilometer and values measured with the noncontact laser profilometer. However, laser profilometer values were four to six times higher, indicating that roughness parameters measured by the two different profilometers cannot be compared directly. Findings of this study point consistently to the influence of third body wear particles on prosthetic femoral head roughness and polyethylene wear. These results stress the importance of minimizing all foreign body debris in maintaining a well functioning articular couple.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- In vivo wear of Ti6Al4V femoral heads: A retrieval studyJournal of Biomedical Materials Research, 1996
- Effect of Counterface Material on the Characteristics of Retrieved Uncemented Cobalt-Chromium and Titanium Alloy Total Hip ReplacementsProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 1996
- The relationship between the design, position, and articular wear of acetabular components inserted without cement and the development of pelvic osteolysis.Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1994
- Severe osteolysis of the pelvic in association with acetabular replacement without cement.Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1993
- Wear of polyethylene acetabular cups against alumina femoral heads: 5 prostheses compared in a hip simulator for 35 million walking cyclesActa Orthopaedica, 1993
- Wear of the polyethylene acetabular cup: Metallic and ceramic heads compared in a hip simulatorActa Orthopaedica, 1993
- Periprosthetic bone loss in total hip arthroplasty. Polyethylene wear debris and the concept of the effective joint space.Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1992
- The wear behavior of ion‐implanted Ti‐6Al‐4V against UHMW polyethyleneJournal of Biomedical Materials Research, 1990
- The role of counterface imperfections in the wear of polyethyleneWear, 1987
- The effect of the surface finish of alumina and stainless steel on the wear rate of UHMW polyethyleneBiomaterials, 1986