EVOLUTION OF CONDITION-DEPENDENT SEX ORNAMENTS AND MATING PREFERENCES: SEXUAL SELECTION BASED ON VIABILITY DIFFERENCES
- 1 July 1986
- Vol. 40 (4) , 804-816
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1986.tb00540.x
Abstract
The possibility that the evolution of mating preferences and secondary sex traits can be based on heritable differences in viability is examined with a three-locus model. Earlier genetic models suggested that viability-based processes alone cannot explain the evolution of mate choice and sex ornaments that reduce survival; a Fisherian mating advantage seemed necessary. The present model is based on a monogamous mating system that precludes such a mating advantage. A key assumption is that ornament development depends on the phenotypic condition and overall genotype of the possessor; there is evidence that secondary sex traits often mirror nutritional status and health, sometimes through hormonal mediation. Ornament and preference can then hitchhike slowly to high frequency with alleles that confer a slight survival advantage, provided that such alleles become available often enough. The evolution of mating preferences and secondary sex traits that reflect overall genotypic constitution therefore can be based solely on viability differences, no Fisherian mating advantage being required. In practice, these and several other mechanisms of sexual selection may occur together.Funding Information
- Swedish Natural Sciences Research Council (4425105)
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mate selection—A selection for a handicapPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Sexual selection and the importance of viability differences: a replyJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1986
- Sexual selection, Handicaps and true fintessJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1985
- Phenotypic plasticity and the handicap principleJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1984
- Sexual selection, additive genetic variance and the “phenotypic handicap”Journal of Theoretical Biology, 1983
- The courtship handicap—phenotypic effectJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1982
- The handicap principle—A commentJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1978
- On the handicap principle—A critical defenceJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1978
- Sexual selection for a handicap: A critical analysis of Zahavi's modelJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1976
- Sexual selection and the handicap principleJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1976