Familial Risk of Cancer Shortly After Diagnosis of the First Familial Tumor
Open Access
- 2 November 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Vol. 97 (21) , 1575-1579
- https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/dji338
Abstract
Background: The diagnosis of the first cancer in a family may lead to the medical examination of the patient's relatives and the subsequent identification of additional familial cancers. If detection bias is present, familial risks could be overestimated soon after first diagnosis. Methods: We followed 1 677 722 offspring/siblings of 846 448 probands from the year of diagnosis of the first familial tumor to the diagnosis of first cancer, death, emigration, or December 31, 2002, using the Swedish Family Cancer Database. The risks of cancer among the offspring and siblings of patients with melanoma and cancers of the breast, prostate, colorectum, cervix, and lung were compared with those in the general population. Relative risks (RRs) were determined using Poisson regression, according to the time after first diagnosis. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: Daughters of women with breast cancer had a statistically significantly higher relative risk of in situ breast cancer during the year of the mother's diagnosis than they did 5 or more years later (RR = 4.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.16 to 10.6, 26.6 cases per 100 000, versus RR = 1.97, 95% CI = 1.65 to 2.37, 27.2 cases per 100 000; P = .033). Daughters diagnosed the same year as their mothers were younger and were diagnosed earlier in the calendar year than daughters of women diagnosed 5 or more years after their mothers. Similarly, the risk of invasive melanoma among the offspring of individuals with invasive melanoma was higher during the year of the parent's diagnosis than it was 5 or more years afterward (RR = 8.27, 95% CI = 3.82 to 17.9, 57.0 cases per 100 000, versus RR = 3.18, 95% CI = 2.55 to 3.97, 37.6 cases per 100 000; P = .019). Sibling risks of in situ breast cancer, in situ cervical cancer, and invasive prostate cancer also decreased with time after diagnosis of the first familial tumor. Conclusions: Increased surveillance may result in the earlier detection of asymptomatic familial cancers, i.e., in detection bias. The possibility of overestimated familial risks of cancer shortly after diagnosis of the first familial tumor should be considered before a patient's clinical and genetic counseling is implemented.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of screening for breast cancer on its age-incidence relationships and familial riskInternational Journal of Cancer, 2005
- Randomized Trial of Different Screening Strategies for Colorectal Cancer: Patient Response and Detection RatesJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2005
- Application of Genetics to the Prevention of Colorectal CancerPublished by Springer Nature ,2005
- Clinical genetic counselling for familial cancers requires reliable data on familial cancer risks and general action plansJournal of Medical Genetics, 2004
- Overdiagnosis in early detection programsBiostatistics, 2004
- Prostate cancer screening, changing age‐specific incidence trends and implications on familial riskInternational Journal of Cancer, 2004
- Genetic epidemiology of cancer: From families to heritable genesInternational Journal of Cancer, 2004
- Overdiagnosis in screening: is the increase in breast cancer incidence rates a cause for concern?Journal of Medical Screening, 2004
- Risk of prostate cancer associated with a family history in an era of rapid increase in prostate cancer diagnosis (Australia)Cancer Causes & Control, 2003
- Effect of organised screening on cervical cancer incidence and mortality in Finland, 1963-1995: Recent increase in cervical cancer incidenceInternational Journal of Cancer, 1999