Gendered Contributions to Parliamentary Debates: The Case of Euthanasia
- 1 March 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Australian Journal of Political Science
- Vol. 34 (1) , 29-45
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10361149950443
Abstract
This paper seeks to extend our understanding of the contribution women parliamentarians make to the Commonwealth parliament. The euthanasia debate, precipitated by the 1996 Andrews Bill, provided a rare opportunity to compare male and female parliamentarians' contributions without the constraint of formal party discipline. This unusual set of circumstances allowed us to focus on whether women make a distinctive contribution to parliamentary debate, without the complicating influence of party. We have been able to show that under certain circumstances, women do bring a different focus to parliamentary debate, and in so doing, may, in sufficient numbers, alter the status quo.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Instituting Gender:Women & Politics, 1996
- Women Politicians: Transforming Westminster?Parliamentary Affairs, 1996
- Gender Power, Leadership, and GovernancePublished by University of Michigan Library ,1995
- Power and Influence in State Legislative Policymaking: The Interaction of Gender and Position in Committee Hearing DebatesAmerican Political Science Review, 1994
- Representing Women:Women & Politics, 1991
- The Impact of Women on State Legislative PoliciesThe Journal of Politics, 1991
- The Impact of Gender on Activities and Priorities of State LegislatorsThe Western Political Quarterly, 1991
- What Happened to the Feminist Revolution in Political Science?: A Review EssayThe Western Political Quarterly, 1990
- HIERARCHIES, JOBS, BODIES:Gender & Society, 1990
- Uncovering the Political Impacts of Gender: An Exploratory StudyThe Western Political Quarterly, 1989