Choice of Partners in Multiple Two-Person Prisoner's Dilemma Games
- 1 December 2001
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Conflict Resolution
- Vol. 45 (6) , 770-793
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002701045006004
Abstract
The effect of unilateral and mutual partner selection in the context of prisoner's dilemmas is examined. Participants played simultaneously several finitely repeated, two-person prisoner's dilemma games. Results show that unilateral choice leads to lower defection and fewer exits than mutual choice. In the unilateral-choice setup, intending defectors are more likely to exit than intending cooperators. Implications of these findings in the political context are discussed.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Exit, Voice, and Hostility in CubaPublished by JSTOR ,2000
- Selective Play: Choosing Partners in an Uncertain WorldPersonality and Social Psychology Review, 1998
- Dictator game giving: Rules of fairness versus acts of kindnessInternational Journal of Game Theory, 1998
- Physical Attractiveness, Opportunity, and Success in Everyday ExchangeAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1998
- Cooperation in Community Interaction without Information FlowsThe Review of Economic Studies, 1996
- Preferential partner selection in an evolutionary study of Prisoner's DilemmaBiosystems, 1996
- The Advantage of Being Moderately CooperativeAmerican Political Science Review, 1995
- Rational Cooperation in the Finitely Repeated Prisoner's Dilemma: Experimental EvidenceThe Economic Journal, 1993
- Exit, Voice, and the Fate of the German Democratic Republic: An Essay in Conceptual HistoryWorld Politics, 1993
- Rational cooperation in the finitely repeated prisoners' dilemmaJournal of Economic Theory, 1982