Use of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction or Wall‐Motion Score Index in Predicting Arrhythmic Death in Patients Following an Acute Myocardial Infarction
- 1 October 1997
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
- Vol. 20 (10) , 2553-2559
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1997.tb06104.x
Abstract
All‐cause mortality and morbidity following an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are correlated to LV systolic dysfunction. The correlation is closest with mortality and morbidity associated with congestive heart failure (CHF). Prediction of arrhythmic death in patients with AMI relies on the correlation between arrhythmic death and “sudden unexpected death” defined as death within 1 hour of onset of new symptoms. Assessment of late potentials, heart rate variability (HRV), T wave alternans, arrhythmias seen on Holter monitoring or during exercise testing, electrophysiological testing, and baroreceptor assessment have all proven to be useful in the prediction of sudden death even when LV systolic function is known. In selected populations HRV is superior to LV systolic function assessment in predicting sudden death and/or arrhythmic events, and may even predict all‐cause mortality with the same precision. Comparisons of other methods with LV function assessment should be interpreted with care because most methods have been evaluated in subgroups of infarct patients with a low risk of death. Results from a large series of high risk patients with AMI (the TRAndolapril Cardiac Evaluation study) have shown that even in patients with severe depressed LV systolic function around one‐third of the patients will die suddenly. The current situation is that LV function appears to be the best method of predicting death whereas other methods appear very promising for detecting arrhythmic death in more selected populations. The optimal method for selecting patients at high risk of arrhythmic death has not yet been developed, but a combination of LV function and another method, i.e., HRV, appears promising. This may ensure that the enrolled patients have an increased risk of death and that this risk will be due to arrhythmic events. Patients with LVEF of 10% or less can be excluded as they will most likely not die suddenly.Keywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Recent Trends in Acute Coronary Heart Disease — Mortality, Morbidity, Medical Care, and Risk FactorsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Exploration of the Precision of Classifying Sudden Cardiac DeathCirculation, 1996
- Clinical Characteristics and Mortality of Patients Screened for Entry Into the Trandolapril Cardiac Evaluation (TRACE) StudyThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1995
- Relation between heart rate variability early after acute myocardial infarction and long-term mortalityThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1994
- Comparison of the predictive characteristics of heart rate variability index and left ventricular ejection fraction for all-cause mortality, arrhythmic events and sudden death after acute myocardial infarctionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1991
- Mechanism of death and prevalence of myocardial ischemic symptoms in the terminal event after acute myocardial infarctionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1988
- Arrhythmias and sudden death in mitral valve prolapseAmerican Heart Journal, 1987
- Decreased heart rate variability and its association with increased mortality after acute myocardial infarctionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1987
- Variable spectrum and prognostic implications of left and right ventricular ejection fractions in patients with and without clinical heart failure after acute myocardial infarctionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1986
- Early prediction of mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a prospective study of clinical and radionuclide risk factorsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1986