Ancient Chinese medical ethics and the four principles of biomedical ethics.
Open Access
- 1 August 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Medical Ethics
- Vol. 25 (4) , 315-321
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.25.4.315
Abstract
The four principles approach to biomedical ethics (4PBE) has, since the 1970s, been increasingly developed as a universal bioethics method. Despite its wide acceptance and popularity, the 4PBE has received many challenges to its cross-cultural plausibility. This paper first specifies the principles and characteristics of ancient Chinese medical ethics (ACME), then makes a comparison between ACME and the 4PBE with a view to testing out the 4PBE's cross-cultural plausibility when applied to one particular but very extensive and prominent cultural context. The result shows that the concepts of respect for autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence and justice are clearly identifiable in ACME. Yet, being influenced by certain socio-cultural factors, those applying the 4PBE in Chinese society may tend to adopt a "beneficence-oriented", rather than an "autonomy-oriented" approach, which, in general, is dissimilar to the practice of contemporary Western bioethics, where "autonomy often triumphs".Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- Not just autonomy--the principles of American biomedical ethics.Journal of Medical Ethics, 1995
- Medical ethics: four principles plus attention to scopeBMJ, 1994
- Social Orientation and Individual Modernity among Chinese Students in TaiwanThe Journal of Social Psychology, 1981