Coevolution of Sender and Receiver: Effect on Local Mate Preference in Cricket Frogs
- 24 June 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Science
- Vol. 240 (4860) , 1786
- https://doi.org/10.1126/science.240.4860.1786
Abstract
Mate recognition in frogs requires congruence of call characters, such as dominant frequency, and properties ofthe auditory system, such as frequency sensitivity of inner ear organs. Two neighboring populations of cricket frogs (Acri crepitans) exhibit statistically significant differences in the dominant frequency of the advertisement call and the frequency to which the basilar papilla of the inner ear is most sensitive. Call frequency and frequency sensitivity are matched within but differ between populations. These characters usually are negatively correlated with body size, and thus their congruence and coevolution often is explained by pleiotropic effects of size. However, within this species call frequency and frequency sensitivity ofthe basilar papilla evolved independent of body size, yielding local mate preferences that could contribute to genetic differentiation among neighboring populations.This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Asymmetries in Mating Preferences Between Species: Female Swordtails Prefer Heterospecific MalesScience, 1987
- The Auditory Behavior of Crickets: Some Views of Genetic Coupling, Song Recognition, and Predator DetectionThe Quarterly Review of Biology, 1985
- The auditory system of anuran amphibiansProgress in Neurobiology, 1984
- Sexual Selection, Social Competition, and SpeciationThe Quarterly Review of Biology, 1983
- Behavioral Phylogenies and the Direction of EvolutionScience, 1983
- A comparative study of auditory sensitivity in the genus Bufo (amphibia)Behavioural Processes, 1981
- Female Mate Choice in a Neotropical FrogScience, 1980
- Encoding of Geographic Dialects in the Auditory System of the Cricket FrogScience, 1973
- Culturally Transmitted Patterns of Vocal Behavior in SparrowsScience, 1964
- Size Difference as a Possible Isolation Mechanism in MicrohylaThe American Naturalist, 1955