Healing Society: Medical Language in American Eugenics
- 1 January 1995
- journal article
- other
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Science in Context
- Vol. 8 (1) , 175-196
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0269889700001940
Abstract
The Argument: American eugenics developed out of a cultural tradition independent of medicine. However, the eugenicist Harry Hamilton Laughlin and some legal experts involved in eugenic practice in the United States used medical language in discussing and evaluating enforced eugenic sterilizations. They built on medicine as a model for healing, while at the same time playing down medicine's concern with its traditional client: the individual patient. Laughlin's attitude toward medicine was ambivalent because he wanted expert eugenicists, rather than medical experts, to control eugenic practice. In contrast, legal experts saw eugenics as an integral part of medicine, though one expert challenged basing the judicial system on eugenically minded medicine. All in all, the medicalization of American eugenics involved expanding the scope of medicine to include the mutilation of individuals for the benefit of society. The judicial system was medicalized in that an expanded medicine became the basis of legislation in the thirty states that permitted eugenic sterilizationsKeywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- GenethicsPublished by University of California Press ,1992
- The Eugenics Record Office at Cold Spring Harbor, 1910-1940: An Essay in Institutional HistoryOsiris, 1986
- The appearance of academic biology in late nineteenth-century AmericaJournal of the History of Biology, 1984
- Buck v. Bell: "Felt Necessities" v. Fundamental Values?Columbia Law Review, 1981
- Julia Lathrop and the Children's Bureau: The Emergence of an InstitutionSocial Service Review, 1981