Quantification of Blood Flow in Brain Tumors: Comparison of Arterial Spin Labeling and Dynamic Susceptibility-weighted Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging
Top Cited Papers
- 1 August 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in Radiology
- Vol. 228 (2) , 523-532
- https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2282020409
Abstract
To implement an arterial spin labeling technique that is feasible in routine examinations and to test the method and compare it with dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for evaluation of tumor blood flow (TBF) in patients with brain tumors. Thirty-six patients with histologically proven brain tumors were examined at 1.5 T. A second version of quantitative imaging of perfusion by using a single subtraction with addition of thin-section periodic saturation after inversion and a time delay (Q2TIPS) technique of pulsed arterial spin labeling in the multisection mode was implemented. After arterial spin labeling, a combined T2- and T2*-weighted first-pass bolus perfusion study (gadopentetate dimeglumine, 0.2 mmol/kg) was performed by using a double-echo echo-planar imaging sequence. In regions of interest, maps of absolute and relative cerebral blood flow were computed and analyzed with arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MR imaging, respectively. Both techniques yielded the highest perfusion values in imaging of glioblastomas and the lowest values in imaging of two low-grade gliomas that both showed strong gadopentetate dimeglumine enhancement. There was a close linear correlation between dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MR imaging and arterial spin labeling in the tumor region of interest (linear regression coefficient, R = 0.83; P <.005). Blood flow is underestimated with arterial spin labeling at low flow rates. High- and low-grade gliomas can be distinguished at the same level of significance with both methods. Absolute TBF is less important for tumor grading than is the ratio of TBF to age-dependent mean brain perfusion. Arterial spin labeling is a suitable method for assessment of microvascular perfusion and allows distinction between high- and low-grade gliomas.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Correlation of Microvascular Permeability Derived from Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging with Histologic Grade and Tumor Labeling IndexAcademic Radiology, 2001
- Glial Neoplasms: Dynamic Contrast-enhanced T2*-weighted MR ImagingRadiology, 1999
- Cerebral Blood Flow Measurements by Magnetic Resonance Imaging Bolus Tracking: Comparison with [15O]H2O Positron Emission Tomography in HumansJournal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, 1998
- High resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages. Part I: Mathematical approach and statistical analysisMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1996
- Revising the World Health Organization (WHO) Blue Book??Histological Typing of Tumours of the Central Nervous System?Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 1995
- MR Contrast Due to Microscopically Heterogeneous Magnetic Susceptibility: Numerical Simulations and Applications to Cerebral PhysiologyMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1991
- What Is the Evidence That Tumors Are Angiogenesis Dependent?JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1990
- Absence of contrast enhancement on CT brain scans of patients with supratentorial malignant gliomasNeurology, 1988
- Selective spin inversion in nuclear magnetic resonance and coherent optics through an exact solution of the Bloch-Riccati equationPhysical Review A, 1985