Delivery Room Continuous Positive Airway Pressure/Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants: A Feasibility Trial
- 1 September 2004
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) in Pediatrics
- Vol. 114 (3) , 651-657
- https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2004-0394
Abstract
Objective. Although earlier studies have suggested that early continuous airway positive pressure (CPAP) may be beneficial in reducing ventilator dependence and subsequent chronic lung disease in the extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infant, the time of initiation of CPAP has varied, and there are no prospective studies of infants who have received CPAP or positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) from initial resuscitation in the delivery room (DR). Current practice for the ELBW infant includes early intubation and the administration of prophylactic surfactant, often in the DR. The feasibility of initiating CPAP in the DR and continuing this therapy without intubation for surfactant has never been determined prospectively in a population of ELBW infants. This study was designed to determine the feasibility of randomizing ELBW infants of Methods. Infants who were of 0.3 with an oxygen saturation by pulse oximeter of Results. A total of 104 infants were enrolled over a 6-month period: 55 CPAP and 49 control infants. No infant was intubated in the DR for the exclusive purpose of surfactant administration. Forty-seven infants were intubated for resuscitation in the DR: 27 of 55 CPAP infants and 20 of 49 control infants. Only 4 of the 43 infants who had a birth weight of Conclusions. This study demonstrated that infants could be randomized successfully to a DR intervention of CPAP/PEEP compared with no CPAP/PEEP, with intubation provided only for resuscitation indications, and subsequent intubation for prespecified criteria. Forty-five percent (47 of 104) of infants <28 weeks’ gestation required intubation for resuscitation in the DR. CPAP/PEEP in the DR did not affect the need for intubation at birth or during the subsequent week. Overall, 20% of infants did not need intubation by 7 days of life. This experience should be helpful in facilitating the design of subsequent prospective studies of ventilatory support in ELBW infants.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Continuous distending pressure for respiratory distress in preterm infantsPublished by Wiley ,2002
- Prophylactic versus selective use of surfactant in preventing morbidity and mortality in preterm infantsPublished by Wiley ,2001
- Nasal continuous positive airway pressure and outcomes of preterm infantsJournal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 2001
- Do Clinical Markers of Barotrauma and Oxygen Toxicity Explain Interhospital Variation in Rates of Chronic Lung Disease?Pediatrics, 2000
- Early versus delayed selective surfactant treatment for neonatal respiratory distress syndromePublished by Wiley ,1999
- Delivery Room Management of Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants: Spontaneous Breathing or Intubation?Pediatrics, 1999
- Neonatal care of very‐low‐birthweight infants in special‐care units and neonatal intensive‐care units in Stockholm. Early nasal continuous positive airway pressure versus mechanical ventilation: gains and lossesActa Paediatrica, 1997
- Porcine surfactant replacement therapy in newborns of 25‐31 weeks’gestation: a randomized, multicentre trial of prophylaxis versus rescue with multiple low dosesActa Paediatrica, 1995
- Surfactant Therapy and Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Newborns with Respiratory Distress SyndromeNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- Treatment of the Idiopathic Respiratory-Distress Syndrome with Continuous Positive Airway PressureNew England Journal of Medicine, 1971