Early versus late alternating chemotherapy in small-cell lung cancer
- 1 February 1995
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier in Annals of Oncology
- Vol. 6 (2) , 157-166
- https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a059111
Abstract
From 1984 to 1989, the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) performed a randomized phase 111 trial comparing early versus late alternating chemotherapy in patients with small-cell lung cancer. 406 eligible patients were entered into the trial. Regimen A consisted of PAV(cisPlatin, Adriamycin, VP 16–213, and Regimen B of CyMOC (Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, Oncovin, CCNU). Cycles were repeated as rapidly as possible. Patients were randomized to receive either ABABAB (early alternating chemotherapy) or AAABBB (late alternating chemotherapy). After six cycles patients with limited disease in complete or partial remission and those with extensive disease in complete remission received irradiation to the primary (45 Gy) and the CNS (36 Gy). The overall remission rate was 87%, with 31% complete remissions. The median survival of all 406 eligible patients was 346 days, with 15% of the patients alive at two years. The overall remission rate, the rate of complete remission, the median survival and the rate of long-term survival were not significantly different in the two treatment arms. In limited disease the estimated percentages of survival at 2 years were 33% in the early and 24% in the late alternating chemotherapy arms. Patients with extensive disease survived significantly longer with late alternating chemotherapy than on the early alternation regimen (median survival 336 days versus 301 days, p=0.01). In the latter patients the received dose intensities (RD1) of cisplatin, adriamycin and etoposide were significantly higher in the late-alternation arm. Patients treated with early alternating chemotherapy rated their tumor symptoms, functional states, fatigue/malaise and restriction of social activity significantly better, reflecting an improved subjective adjustment. Alternating chemotherapy with PAV-Cy-MOC plus consolidating radiotherapy is a feasible and effective treatment for small-cell lung cancer, with acceptable toxicity. Whereas patnts with early alternating chemotherapy achieve a better subjective adjustment, late alternating chemotherapy allows for a higher RDI of cisplatin, adriamycin and etoposide, which results in a significantly longer median survival of patients with extensive disease.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Long term follow-up (F/U) from SWOG 8269: concurrent cisplatin (P), etoposide (E), vincristine (V) and daily thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) for the treatment of limited small-cell lung cancer (LSCLC): patterns of failure and second tumors : A Turrisi, D Rector, LM Janaki, JD McCracken, R Livingston, SP Giri, W Gordon, and J Crowley. from the Southwest Oncology Group, San Antonio, Texas, USALung Cancer, 1994
- Feasibility of quality of life assessment in a randomized phase III trial of small cell lung cancerAnnals of Oncology, 1992
- Quality of life during chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer: Assessment and use of a daily diary card in a randomized trialEuropean Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology, 1990
- Alternating or sequential chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer?Lung Cancer, 1989
- A Modular Approach to Quality-of-Life Assessment in Cancer Clinical TrialsPublished by Springer Nature ,1988
- Chemotherapy with or without Radiation Therapy in Limited Small-Cell Carcinoma of the LungNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Etoposide, cisplatin and doxorubicin in patients with small cell lung cancer: Tumor response and long term survivalEuropean Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology, 1986
- Chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer.BMJ, 1985
- Radiotherapy in small cell cancer of the lung treated with combination chemotherapy: a controlled trial.BMJ, 1984
- Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete ObservationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1958