Evidence that protein disulfide isomerase (PDI) is involved in DNA–nuclear matrix anchoring

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
DNA–nuclear matrix (NM) anchoring plays a critical role in the organization of DNA within the nucleus and in functional access to DNA for transcription, replication, and DNA repair. The cellular response to oxidative stress involves both gene expression and DNA repair. We, therefore, determined if changes in the oxidative–reductive environment can affect DNA–NM anchoring. The present study used two approaches to study the effect of the reducing agent DTT on DNA–NM anchoring. First, the relative stringency of the DNA–NM attachment was determined by measuring the ability of NM attached DNA loops to undergo supercoiling changes. Second, the effects of DTT on the association of nuclear proteins with DNA were determined by cisplatin crosslinking. When nucleoids (nuclear matrices with attached DNA loops) were prepared from HeLa cells with 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), supercoiled DNA loops unwound more efficiently compared with control in the presence of increasing propidium iodide (PI) concentrations. In addition, the rewinding of DNA supercoils in nucleoids treated with DTT was inhibited. Both effects on DNA supercoiling ability were reversed by diamide suggesting that they are dependent on the oxidation state of the protein thiols. When DTT treated nucleoids were isolated from γ-irradiated cells, the inhibition of DNA supercoil rewinding was equal to the sum of the inhibition due to DTT and γ-rays alone. Nucleoids isolated from heat-shocked cells with DTT, showed no inhibition of DNA rewinding, except a small inhibition at high PI concentrations. Nuclear DNA in DTT-treated nuclei was digested faster by DNase I than in untreated nuclei. These results suggest that DTT is altering DNA–NM anchoring by affecting the protein component(s) of the anchoring complex. Extracting NM with increasing concentrations of DTT did not solubilize any protein to a significant extent until measurable NM disintegration occurred. Therefore, we determined if 1 mM DTT affected the ability of 1 mM cisplatin to crosslink proteins to DNA. Isolated nuclei were treated with 1 mM DTT for 30 min or left untreated prior to crosslinking with 1 mM cisplatin for 2 h at 4°C. The ability of capsulation to crosslink DNA to proteins per se, did not appear to be affected by 1 mM DTT because relative amounts of at least four proteins, 69, 60, 40, and 35 kDa, were crosslinked to DNA to the same extent in DTT-treated and untreated nuclei. However, protein disulfide isomerase (PDI) crosslinked to DNA in untreated nuclei, but did not crosslink DNA in nuclei that were treated with 1 mM DTT; 1 mM DTT did not affect the intranuclear localization of PDI. Thus, DTT appears to alter the conformation of PDI, as suggested by the DTT-induced change in DNA association, but not its NM association. These results also imply that DNA–NM anchoring involves the redox state of protein sulfhydryl groups. J. Cell. Biochem. 85: 689–702, 2002.