Gemcitabine‐based combinations for inoperable pancreatic cancer: Have we made real progress?
Open Access
- 18 June 2007
- Vol. 110 (3) , 525-533
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.22809
Abstract
BACKGROUND.: Several attempts have been made at improving the efficacy of gemcitabine in advanced pancreatic cancer by combining it with other chemotherapeutic or molecularly targeted agents. However, randomized trials have produced conflicting results.METHODS.: All prospective, randomized, phase 3 trials that compared single‐agent gemcitabine with gemcitabine‐based combinations were considered eligible for the current analysis. A literature‐based meta‐analysis was performed, event‐based relative risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals were derived through both a fixed‐effect model approach and a random‐effect model approach, and overall survival (OS) was explored as the primary endpoint. To estimate the magnitude of the eventual benefit, absolute differences and the number of patients needed to treat (NNT) for 1 patient to benefit were calculated. A sensitivity analysis for OS was performed according to the type of agent used in combination with gemcitabine.RESULTS.: Twenty trials that involved 6296 patients were identified. No significant differences in the primary endpoint were observed in the overall population or in the sensitivity analysis. Conversely, a significant advantage was evident with regard to both progression‐free survival (PFS) and the overall response rate (ORR) in the overall population, with an absolute benefit of 2.6% (NTT = 39 patients) and 3.0% (NNT = 33 patients). Platinum combinations led to the greatest absolute benefits for PFS and ORR compared with single‐agent gemcitabine (10% and 6.5%, respectively), but this did not result in an OS benefit. Improvement in PFS, but not in the ORR, was correlated with an improvement in OS.CONCLUSIONS.: Single‐agent gemcitabine remains the standard of care for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. However, platinum/gemcitabine combinations appeared to improve PFS and the ORR and, thus, may be considered in selected patients. Cancer 2007. © 2007 American Cancer Society.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Re: Survival With Aromatase Inhibitors and Inactivators Versus Standard Hormonal Therapy in Advanced Breast Cancer: Meta-analysisJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2007
- upper gastrointestinal tumorsAnnals of Oncology, 2006
- A multicenter phase III trial comparing irinotecan-gemcitabine (IG) with gemcitabine (G) monotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancerBritish Journal of Cancer, 2006
- Benefit of taxanes as adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancerCancer, 2006
- Hand-Foot Syndrome After Dose-Dense Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: A Case SeriesJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2006
- Cancer Statistics, 2006CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2006
- Gemcitabine Doublets in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: Should We Move On?Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2006
- Fixed dose‐rate gemcitabine infusion as first‐line treatment for advanced‐stage carcinoma of the pancreas and biliary treeCancer, 2005
- Comparison of Gemcitabine Versus the Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibitor BAY 12-9566 in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas: A Phase III Trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials GroupJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2003
- Gemcitabine alone or with cisplatin for the treatment of patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic pancreatic carcinomaCancer, 2002