The Randomized Trials of Dose-Intensive Therapy for Breast Cancer: What Do They Mean for Patient Care and Where Do We Go From Here?
Open Access
- 1 December 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Oncologist
- Vol. 4 (6) , 450-458
- https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.4-6-450
Abstract
At the May 1999 meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), results of some of the randomized trials conducted in the 1990s assessing the value of high-dose (dose-intensive) therapy for breast cancer were presented. The number of women treated with such therapy has grown almost exponentially since the early 1990s so that breast cancer is now the most common malignancy treated with stem cell transplant. At the same time the cost of such treatment (from $60,000 upwards to $150,000) has caused it to become the most controversial issue in all of medical oncology during this past decade. Does such therapy truly provide a benefit to women with breast cancer, and is it therefore a therapy that should be routinely offered to suitable patients? This article will attempt to put this issue in some perspective with emphasis on the recently reported randomized studies of this treatment for both early-stage and metastatic disease. In addition, some comments will be made regarding where research regarding this topic will likely be focused in the next few years.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cancer statistics, 1999CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 1999
- Randomised trial of high-dose chemotherapy and haemopoietic progenitor-cell support in operable breast cancer with extensive axillary lymph-node involvementThe Lancet, 1998
- Breast cancer studies in the NetherlandsThe Lancet, 1996
- Pathologic correlates of prognosis in lymph node-positive breast carcinomasCancer, 1993
- Human breast cancer: survival from first metastasisBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 1992
- Systemic treatment of early breast cancer by hormonal, cytotoxic, or immune therapyThe Lancet, 1992
- Diverse prognosis in metastatic breast cancer: Who should be offered alternative initial therapies?Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 1989
- Development and Use of a Natural History Data Base of Breast Cancer StudiesAmerican Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1987
- Response to treatment and its influence on survival in metastatic breast cancerAmerican Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1985
- A comparison of intermittent vs. continuous and of adriamycin vs. methotrexate 5-drug chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer A Cancer and Leukemia Group B studyAmerican Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1984