Dating the Tree of Life
- 13 June 2003
- journal article
- special viewpoints
- Published by American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Science
- Vol. 300 (5626) , 1698-1700
- https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1077795
Abstract
The relative merits of molecular and paleontological dates of major branching points in the tree of life are currently debated. In some cases, molecular date estimates are up to twice as old as paleontological dates. However, although it is true that paleontological dates are often too young (missing fossils), molecular dates are often too old (statistical bias). Intense study of the dating of major splits in the tree of mammals has shown rapprochement as fossil dates become older and molecular dates become younger.Keywords
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- MATHEMATICAL CONSEQUENCES OF THE GENEALOGICAL SPECIES CONCEPTEvolution, 2002
- Molecular Evidence for the Early Colonization of Land by Fungi and PlantsScience, 2001
- Can fast early rates reconcile molecular dates with the Cambrian explosion?Proceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2000
- Molecular evidence for the early divergence of placental mammalsBioEssays, 1999
- Divergence time estimates for the early history of animal phyla and the origin of plants, animals and fungiProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 1999
- Molecular and Morphological Phylogenies of Mammals: Congruence with Stratigraphic DataMolecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 1998
- Commemoration of the “Molecules and Morphology in Systematics” Meetings held in Paris, France, March 24–March 28, 1997Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 1998
- Testing the quality of the fossil record by groups and by major habitatsHistorical Biology, 1996
- The Fossil Record and Evolution: Comparing Cladistic and Paleontologic Evidence for Vertebrate HistoryScience, 1992
- Phylogeny of the major tetrapod groups: Morphological data and divergence datesJournal of Molecular Evolution, 1990