Comparison of baseline and repeated measure covariate techniques in the Framingham heart study
- 1 January 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 7 (1-2) , 205-218
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780070122
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to indicate how repeated measures on risk factors have been employed in the prediction of the development of disease in the Framingham Heart Study. Since these measures vary over time, the method accounts for time dependent covariates. The technique is a generalized person‐years approach in that it treats each observation interval (of equal length) as a mini‐follow‐up study in which the current risk factor measurements are employed to predict an event in the interval. Observations over multiple intervals are pooled into a single sample to predict the short term risk of an event. This approach is compared to the long‐term prediction of disease which utilizes only the baseline measurements and ignores subsequent repeated measures on the risk factors.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- A comparison of the logistic risk function and the proportional hazards model in prospective epidemiologic studiesJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1985
- The Analysis of Panel Data under a Markov AssumptionJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1985
- Design and Analysis Methods for Longitudinal ResearchAnnual Review of Public Health, 1983
- A comparison of the logistic risk function and the proportional hazards model in prospective epidemiologic studiesJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1983
- A Dynamic Analysis of Chronic Disease Development: A Study of Sex Specific Changes in Coronary Heart Disease Incidence and Risk Factors in FraminghamInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1981
- The development of coronary heart disease in relation to sequential biennial measures of cholesterol in the framingham studyJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1966