Issues in Clinical Nursing Research
- 1 April 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Western Journal of Nursing Research
- Vol. 21 (2) , 266-274
- https://doi.org/10.1177/01939459922043767
Abstract
This article presents two case examples in which women with sickle cell disease, when invited to participate in a nursing experiment, requested assignment to the experimental group. This experience stimulated the authors to explore the ethics of random assignment relative to equipoise, informed consent, patient choices, study validity, the clinician-patient relationship, patient support networks, and other issues. There is a need for in-depth discussion about random assignment and its implications within the nursing research and advanced practice communities.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Subverting Randomization in Controlled TrialsJAMA, 1995
- A Desperate Solution: Individual Autonomy and the Double-Blind Controlled ExperimentJournal of Medicine and Philosophy, 1995
- Individual Autonomy and the Double-Blind Controlled Experiment: The Case of Desperate VolunteersJournal of Medicine and Philosophy, 1995
- Ethics, randomization, and technology assessmentCancer, 1994
- Unconventional Medicine in the United States -- Prevalence, Costs, and Patterns of UseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Clinical Trials — Are They Ethical?New England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Of Mice but Not MenNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- The ethics of randomizationCA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 1991
- A randomized study to determine complications associated with duration of insertion of Heparin locksResearch in Nursing & Health, 1990
- The Conflict Between Randomized Clinical Trials and the Therapeutic ObligationJournal of Medicine and Philosophy, 1986