Anisotropy functions for and sources
- 3 December 1998
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Medical Physics
- Vol. 25 (12) , 2271-2278
- https://doi.org/10.1118/1.598458
Abstract
The anisotropy function was defined by AAPM Task Group 43 in a recent report, and reference data were provided. However, some of the data appeared to have large experimental errors. In this work, anisotropy functions are presented for three low‐energy photon‐emitting sources commonly used for brachytherapy: source models 6702 and 6711, and the model 200 source. The data were generated via a two‐step process: the sources' intrinsic radiation emission pattern was determined from in‐air measurements, and these data were used as input to Monte Carlo calculations of the fluence distribution in water. The new anisotropy function values for iodine compare well with earlier data from diode measurements, and seem more physically realistic than some data provided by TG43. Previous palladium data measured with TLDs are more variable, but on the average are similar to the data presented here. The new data have estimated uncertainties of 3%–6%; this level of accuracy should be completely adequate for clinical calculations.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- A source model for efficient brachytherapy computations with Monte CarloMedical Physics, 1996
- Dosimetry of interstitial brachytherapy sources: Recommendations of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 43Medical Physics, 1995
- Anisotropy functions for 103 Pd, 125 I, and 192 Ir interstitial brachytherapy sourcesMedical Physics, 1993
- Thermoluminescent dosimetry for 1 0 3 Pd seeds (model 200) in solid water phantomMedical Physics, 1991
- Dose parameters of 125I and 192Ir seed sourcesMedical Physics, 1989
- Dose distributions of model 6702 I-125 seeds in waterInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1987
- Two-dimensional dose distribution of 1 2 5 I seedsMedical Physics, 1985
- Physical dosimetry of 125I seeds of a new design for interstitial implantInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1983