Charnley wear model for validation of hip simulators' ball diameter versus polytetrafluoroethylene and polyethylene wear

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Wear rates of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and polyethylene cups were compared in 9-channel and 12-channel simulators, using serum lubrication and gravimetric techniques for wear assessment. Cobalt-chromium (CoCr) and alumina ceramic femoral heads in 22-42 mm diameter range were used to validate simulator wear rates against clinical data. This was also the first study of three femoral head sizes evaluated concurrently in a simulator (with three replicate specimens) and also the first report in which any wear experiments were repeated. Fluid absorption artefacts were within ± 1 per cent of wear magnitude for PTFE and ± 8 per cent for polyethylene and were corrected for. Wear rates were linear as a function of test duration. Precision within each set of three cups was within ±6 per cent. The wear rates from experiments repeated over 15 months were reproducible to within ± 24 per cent. However, the magnitudes of the simulator wear rates were not clinically accurate, the PTFE wear rates (2843 mm3/106 cycles; 22 mm diameter) were over three times higher than in vivo, the polyethylene 30 to 50 per cent on the low side (23 mm3/106 cycles; 22 mm diameter). Volumetric wear rate increased with respect to size of femoral head and a linearly increasing relationship of 7-8 per cent/mm was evident with respect to femoral head diameter for both PTFE and polyethylene. These data compared well with the clinical data.