Public support for the death penalty: Retribution as just deserts or retribution as revenge?
- 1 March 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Justice Quarterly
- Vol. 5 (1) , 81-100
- https://doi.org/10.1080/07418828800089621
Abstract
The U.S. Supreme Court has declared that capital punishment is not unconstitutional per se, in part because the high degree of public support for the death penalty indicates that the American public does not consider it to be cruel and unusual punishment. According to the Court, the public's desire for retribution is an appropriate basis for determining that the death penalty is an acceptable criminal sanction. This paper examines the degree of public support for the death penalty and the basis for that support. It also explores the differences between retribution as just deserts and retribution as revenge, and concludes by asking whether a public desire for revenge is an appropriate, enlightened basis for our capital punishment policy.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Over-simplification and error in public opinion surveys on capital punishmentJustice Quarterly, 1986
- Public Goals of Punishment and Support for the Death PenaltyJournal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 1984
- Public Opinion and Capital Punishment: A Close Examination of the Views of Abolitionists and RetentionistsCrime & Delinquency, 1983
- Support for the Death Penalty; Instrumental Response to Crime, or Symbolic Attitude?Law & Society Review, 1982
- Crime, Punishment, and the Decline of Liberal OptimismCrime & Delinquency, 1981
- Public Support for the Death PenaltyCriminal Justice Review, 1980
- Changing Attitudes Toward Capital PunishmentSocial Forces, 1979
- Changing Attitudes toward Capital PunishmentSocial Forces, 1979
- Salience of Crime and Support for Harsher Criminal SanctionsSocial Problems, 1979
- Public Opinion and the Death PenaltyStanford Law Review, 1974