Discreteness and Gradience in Intonational Contrasts
- 1 June 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Language and Speech
- Vol. 42 (2-3) , 283-305
- https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309990420020701
Abstract
The intonation systems of many languages apparently allow gradient linguistic categories by the side of discrete or categorial contrasts. It is argued that these gradient meanings arise when the intonational phonology leaves a certain amount of unused phonetic space, which may be exploited by speakers to convey “meanings” which are naturally associated with nonlinguistic pitch variation. Because these meanings are often similar to the linguistic meanings attached to the phonological intonational categories, the issue of gradience versus discreteness is more difficult inintonation than in other linguistic domains. Three experimental techniques that can be used to investigate the gradient or discrete nature of intonational differences, the “semantic task,” the “imitation task,” and the “pitch range task,” are discussed and evaluated. In addition, it is pointed out, following an earlier discussion by Newport, that categorical perception is a sufficient, but not a necessary, property of phonological discreteness.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prosody in Israeli Sign LanguageLanguage and Speech, 1999
- Extrapolating from Spoken to Signed Prosody via Laboratory PhonologyLanguage and Speech, 1999
- Articulatory evidence for differentiating stress categoriesPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1994
- The English Rhythm Rule as an accent deletion rulePhonology, 1991
- An experimental evaluation of two nuclear-tone taxonomiesLinguistics, 1991
- Intonational structure in Japanese and EnglishPhonology Yearbook, 1986
- An Ethological Perspective on Common Cross-Language Utilization of F₀ of VoicePhonetica, 1984
- Phonological Features of Intonational PeaksLanguage, 1983
- Perception of the speech code.Psychological Review, 1967
- The discrimination of relative onset-time of the components of certain speech and nonspeech patterns.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1961