Specialty Versus Community Hospitals: Referrals, Quality, And Community Benefits
- 1 January 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Health Affairs (Project Hope) in Health Affairs
- Vol. 25 (1) , 106-118
- https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.25.1.106
Abstract
In this paper we compare physician referral patterns, quality, patient satisfaction, and community benefits of physician-owned specialty versus peer competitor hospitals. Our results are based on evidence gathered from site visits to six markets, 2003 Medicare claims, patient focus groups, and Internal Revenue Service data. Although physician-owners are more likely than others to refer to their own facilities and treat a healthier population, there are rationales for these patterns aside from motives for profit. Specialty hospitals provide generally high-quality care to satisfied patients. Uncompensated care plus specialty hospitals' taxes represent a greater burden, in percentage terms, than community benefits provided by nonprofit providers.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cardiac Revascularization in Specialty and General HospitalsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Focused Factories? Physician-Owned Specialty FacilitiesHealth Affairs, 2003
- Changes in Hospital Competitive Strategy: A New Medical Arms Race?Health Services Research, 2003
- Alternative Funding Policies for the Uninsured: Exploring the Value of Hospital Tax ExemptionThe Milbank Quarterly, 2000
- Learning by Doing in CABG SurgeryMedical Care, 1990