Comparative analysis of different laser systems to study cellular responses to DNA damage in mammalian cells
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 7 April 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Nucleic Acids Research
- Vol. 37 (9) , e68
- https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp221
Abstract
Proper recognition and repair of DNA damage is critical for the cell to protect its genomic integrity. Laser microirradiation ranging in wavelength from ultraviolet A (UVA) to near-infrared (NIR) can be used to induce damage in a defined region in the cell nucleus, representing an innovative technology to effectively analyze the in vivo DNA double-strand break (DSB) damage recognition process in mammalian cells. However, the damage-inducing characteristics of the different laser systems have not been fully investigated. Here we compare the nanosecond nitrogen 337 nm UVA laser with and without bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU), the nanosecond and picosecond 532 nm green second-harmonic Nd:YAG, and the femtosecond NIR 800 nm Ti:sapphire laser with regard to the type(s) of damage and corresponding cellular responses. Crosslinking damage (without significant nucleotide excision repair factor recruitment) and single-strand breaks (with corresponding repair factor recruitment) were common among all three wavelengths. Interestingly, UVA without BrdU uniquely produced base damage and aberrant DSB responses. Furthermore, the total energy required for the threshold H2AX phosphorylation induction was found to vary between the individual laser systems. The results indicate the involvement of different damage mechanisms dictated by wavelength and pulse duration. The advantages and disadvantages of each system are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 67 references indexed in Scilit:
- Differential Regulation of the Cellular Response to DNA Double-Strand Breaks in G1Molecular Cell, 2008
- Mechanisms of Laser-Induced Dissection and Transport of Histologic SpecimensBiophysical Journal, 2007
- RNF8 Ubiquitylates Histones at DNA Double-Strand Breaks and Promotes Assembly of Repair ProteinsCell, 2007
- Human CtIP promotes DNA end resectionNature, 2007
- Dynamic assembly of end-joining complexes requires interaction between Ku70/80 and XRCC4Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2006
- Human SMC5/6 complex promotes sister chromatid homologous recombination by recruiting the SMC1/3 cohesin complex to double-strand breaksThe EMBO Journal, 2006
- Spatial organization of the mammalian genome surveillance machinery in response to DNA strand breaksThe Journal of cell biology, 2006
- DNA Damage Response Pathway Uses Histone Modification to Assemble a Double-Strand Break-Specific Cohesin DomainMolecular Cell, 2004
- Histone H2AX phosphorylation is dispensable for the initial recognition of DNA breaksNature Cell Biology, 2003
- DNA Damage during Mitosis in Human Cells Delays the Metaphase/Anaphase Transition via the Spindle-Assembly CheckpointCurrent Biology, 2002