Research governance and the fate of research
- 1 March 2002
- journal article
- Published by Emerald Publishing in British Journal of Clinical Governance
- Vol. 7 (1) , 57-62
- https://doi.org/10.1108/14664100210815440
Abstract
Looks at evidence of the fate of medical research and provides a template for gauging the value of money spent. Provides key issues and learning points which need consideration in order to improve research skills and capabilities. Offers evidence that could be used to improve research governance in health care. Gives learning points for those sponsoring, hosting or managing research and for others becoming involved in research. Concludes that understanding past practices should help in improving those which are current.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- The research needs of primary careBMJ, 2000
- The argument against sentinel node biopsy for malignant melanomaBMJ, 2000
- Risk of acquiring Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease from blood transfusions: systematic review of case-control studiesBMJ, 2000
- Randomised controlled trials in primary care: case studyBMJ, 2000
- Pharmaceutical trials in general practice: the first 100 protocols. An audit by the clinical research ethics committee of the Royal College of General PractitionersBMJ, 1996
- The scandal of poor medical researchBMJ, 1994
- Fate of Research StudiesJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 1992
- Randomised clinical trials in general practice: lessons from a failure.BMJ, 1991