Efficacy, safety and LDL-C goal attainment of ezetimibe 10 mg-simvastatin 20 mg vs. placebo-simvastatin 20 mg in UK-based adults with coronary heart disease and hypercholesterolaemia
- 19 June 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Hindawi Limited in International Journal Of Clinical Practice
- Vol. 60 (8) , 914-921
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2006.01023.x
Abstract
It is increasingly accepted that more intensive lipid-lowering treatment is associated with greater cardiovascular risk reductions in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD), thus providing a rationale for more aggressive LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) targets. Ezetimibe in combination with statin therapy provides an additional approach to lipid management by utilising the additive action of two different mechanisms of LDL-C reduction. In this multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, a total of 98 men and 55 women with CHD and primary hypercholesterolaemia, naïve to statin therapy, were randomised to receive treatment for 6 weeks with either ezetimibe 10 mg-simvastatin 20 mg (n = 77) or placebo-simvastatin 20 mg (n = 75). At 6 weeks, ezetimibe 10 mg-simvastatin 20 mg provided a mean additional LDL-C reduction of 14.6% (95% CI 10.1-19.1) compared with simvastatin monotherapy (p < 0.0001). Moreover, a higher proportion of patients on ezetimibe/simvastatin achieved the National Standard Framework LDL-C standard (<3.0 mmol/l; 93% vs. 75%, p < 0.001) or the new Joint British Societies (JBS 2) goal of LDL-C < 2.0 mmol/l (49.3% vs. 11.1%, p < 0.001). On logistic regression analysis, the odds ratio of achieving target LDL-C with ezetimibe 10 mg-simvastatin 20 mg was 5.1 (95% CI 1.8-15.0) times higher than with simvastatin monotherapy (p = 0.003). Clinical chemistry profiles and proportions of adverse events were similar in both groups at baseline and follow-up. In conclusion, ezetimibe 10 mg-simvastatin 20 mg is a practical, effective and safe option for the treatment of primary hypercholesterolaemia in CHD patients, and brings more patients to new aggressive cholesterol targets compared with simvastatin 20 mg monotherapy.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- High-Dose Atorvastatin vs Usual-Dose Simvastatin for Secondary Prevention After Myocardial InfarctionThe IDEAL Study: A Randomized Controlled TrialJAMA, 2005
- Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90 056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statinsThe Lancet, 2005
- The use of ezetimibe in achieving low density lipoprotein lowering goals in clinical practice: position statement of a United Kingdom consensus panelCurrent Medical Research and Opinion, 2005
- Intensive Lipid Lowering with Atorvastatin in Patients with Stable Coronary DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Dose-comparison study of the combination of ezetimibe and simvastatin (Vytorin) versus atorvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia: The Vytorin Versus Atorvastatin (VYVA) StudyAmerican Heart Journal, 2005
- Implications of Recent Clinical Trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III GuidelinesCirculation, 2004
- Intensive versus Moderate Lipid Lowering with Statins after Acute Coronary SyndromesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Efficacy and safety of a potent new selective cholesterol absorption inhibitor, ezetimibe, in patients with primary hypercholesterolemiaThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2002
- MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20 536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebocontrolled trialPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- The Lipid Treatment Assessment Project (L-TAP)Archives of internal medicine (1960), 2000