Interpretative comments and reference ranges in EQA programs as a tool for improving laboratory appropriateness and effectiveness
- 14 June 2003
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in Clinica Chimica Acta; International Journal of Clinical Chemistry
- Vol. 333 (2) , 209-219
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-8981(03)00188-8
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Which surrogate marker can be used to assess the effectiveness of the laboratory and its contribution to clinical outcome?Annals of Clinical Biochemistry: International Journal of Laboratory Medicine, 2001
- Role of external quality assurance schemes in assessing and improving quality in medical laboratoriesClinica Chimica Acta; International Journal of Clinical Chemistry, 2001
- Cardiac Markers: Centralized or Decentralized Testing?cclm, 1999
- Cardiac markers: present and futureInternational Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Research, 1999
- The clinical importance of laboratory reasoningClinica Chimica Acta; International Journal of Clinical Chemistry, 1999
- Clinical audit and the contribution of the laboratory to clinical outcomeClinica Chimica Acta; International Journal of Clinical Chemistry, 1999
- Reference Intervals: Are Interlaboratory Differences Appropriate?cclm, 1999
- Strategies for the early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction using biochemical markers.American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1999
- Do We Know What Inappropriate Laboratory Utilization Is?JAMA, 1998
- Toward optimal laboratory use. Problems in laboratory testing in primary careJAMA, 1996