The history of disproportionality measures (reporting odds ratio, proportional reporting rates) in spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions

This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:

• The reporting odds ratio versus the proportional reporting ratio: ‘deuce’
  Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 2004
• The reporting odds ratio and its advantages over the proportional reporting ratio
  Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 2004
• Use of Screening Algorithms and Computer Systems to Efficiently Signal Higher-Than-Expected Combinations of Drugs and Events in the US FDA??s Spontaneous Reports Database
  Drug Safety, 2002
• A comparison of measures of disproportionality for signal detection in spontaneous reporting systems for adverse drug reactions
  Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 2002
• Use of proportional reporting ratios (PRRs) for signal generation from spontaneous adverse drug reaction reports
  Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 2001
• Reports of hypoglycaemia associated with the use of ACE inhibitors and other drugs: a case/non‐case study in the French pharmacovigilance system database
  British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1997
• Cough and ACE inhibitors
  The Lancet, 1993
• Serum sickness-like reactions to cefaclor
  Published by Elsevier ,1992
• Spontaneous reporting: how many cases are required to trigger a warning? [see comments]
  British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1991
• stematic Signalling of Adverse Reactions to Drugs
  Methods of Information in Medicine, 1974