HT1080/DR4: A P-Glycoprotein-Negative Human Fibrosarcoma Cell Line Exhibiting Resistance to Topoisomerase II-Reactive Drugs Despite the Presence of a Drug-Sensitive Topoisomerase II
- 3 October 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Vol. 82 (19) , 1553-1561
- https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/82.19.1553
Abstract
HT1080/DR4 (DR4) is a doxorubicin-resistant human fibrosarcma line that exhibits 150-fold cross-resistance to etoposide but does not overexpress P-glycoprotein (one mechanism of multiple drug resistance). We examined anothe possible of multiple drug resistance). We examined another possible mechanism that could explain resistance to bothe doxorubicin and etoposide: a quantitative or qualitative alteration in topoisomerase II, the putative nuclear target of these agents. The amount of immunoreactive topoisomerase II present in whole-cell Iysates and nuclear extracts was three- to 10-fold lower in DRA than in HT1080 cells. However the topoisomerase II in nuclear extracts from both lines was sensitive to the effects of amascrine (AMSA) and etoposide. Following treatment with AMSA, etoposide, and 5-iminodaunorubicin, topoisomerase II-mediated DNA cleavage in DRA cells and nuclei was reduced compared with cleavage in HT1080 parent cells and nuclei. The difference between the Ht1080 and DR4 lines in AMSA-and 5-iminodaunorubicin-induced cleavage was similar in cells and nuclei and could be due to the lower amount of DR4 topoisomerase II. By contrast, the difference between the HT1080 and DR4 lines in etoposideinduced DNA cleavage was much greater in cells than in nuclei. This finding suggested that cytosolic factors, removed from isolated nuclei, could influence the susceptibility of intact cells to the cyotoxic and DNA-cleaving actions of etoposide. The specific activities of several against free-radical damage that may be produced by doxorubicin or etoposide, were significantly differences may constitute an additional mechanism of resistance. Regardless, the magnitude of the resistance of DR4 to doxorubicin and etoposide cannot be explained solely on the basis of a topoisomerase II-related mechanism.[J Natl Cancer Inst 82:1553–1561, 1990]Keywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cooperative sequestration of m-AMSA in L1210 cellsBiochemical Pharmacology, 1982
- Protein-associated deoxyribonucleic acid strand breaks produced in mouse leukemia L1210 cells by ellipticine and 2-methyl-9-hydroxyellipticiniumBiochemical Pharmacology, 1982
- The formation and resealing of intercalator-induced DNA strand breaks in isolated L1210 cell nucleiBiochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 1982
- CYTO-TOXICITY AND DNA STRAND BREAKS BY 5-IMINODAUNORUBICIN IN MOUSE LEUKEMIA-L1210 CELLS - COMPARISON WITH ADRIAMYCIN AND 4'-(9-ACRIDINYLAMINO)METHANESULFON-META-ANISIDIDE1982
- Protein-associated deoxyribonucleic acid strand breaks in L1210 cells treated with the deoxyribonucleic acid intercalating agents 4'-(9-acridinylamino)methanesulfon-m-anisidide and adriamycinBiochemistry, 1981
- Enzymatic Defenses of the Mouse Heart Against Reactive Oxygen MetabolitesJournal of Clinical Investigation, 1980
- Isolation of biologically active ribonucleic acid from sources enriched in ribonucleaseBiochemistry, 1979
- The replication of kinetoplast DNA networks in Crithidia fasciculataCell, 1978
- The incorporation of 3H-cytosine arabinoside and its effect on murine leukemic cells (L5178Y)Biochemical Pharmacology, 1968
- PROTEIN MEASUREMENT WITH THE FOLIN PHENOL REAGENTJournal of Biological Chemistry, 1951