Accuracy of detection of radiographic abnormalities by junior doctors.
- 1 June 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Emergency Medicine Journal
- Vol. 5 (2) , 101-109
- https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.5.2.101
Abstract
This study assessed the ability of junior doctors in accident and emergency to detect radiographic abnormalities. Their assessments of 505 radiographs taken at nights and weekends over a period of 8 months and showing abnormalities were examined. Each assessment by a senior house officer (SHO) was compared with the subsequent diagnosis of a radiologist of senior registrar or consultant status. An error rate of 35% was found. For abnormalities with clinically significant consequences the error rate was 39%. Although this error rate appears high the results are consistent with those of earlier studies in that missed positive radiographs constitute 2.8% of the total number of radiographs taken in the period. It is considered that the proportion of missed abnormalities gives a truer index of SHOs' abilities. No improvement in performance was evident over the 6-month period of the SHOs tenure of post. It is argued that it is unrealistic to expect accident and emergency SHOs to acquire this complex skill simply through experience and that more formal training and guidance is needed.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Can more efficient use be made of x ray examinations in the accident and emergency department?BMJ, 1987
- Should all casualty radiographs be reviewed?BMJ, 1985
- Reducing errors in the accident department: a simple method using radiographers.BMJ, 1985
- A survey of accident and emergency reporting: Results and implicationsClinical Radiology, 1985
- Radiological Interpretation in an Accident and Emergency DepartmentInternational Journal Of Clinical Practice, 1983
- An assessment of the clinical effects of reporting accident and emergency radiographsThe British Journal of Radiology, 1980