Tolerable or Acceptable: A Comparison of Risk Regulation in the United Kingdom and in the Netherlands
- 1 April 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Risk Analysis
- Vol. 25 (2) , 231-241
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00585.x
Abstract
In managing major accident hazards in industry risk, both the United Kingdom and the Netherlands use quantitative risk analysis and quantified risk criteria. These should be understood in the historical, legal, and political context in which they were drawn up. Even when criteria are numerically the same they do not necessarily mean the same thing. The legal and historical context differs widely between the two countries. Nevertheless, it is surprising that the final results in terms of land use and levels of risk are very similar.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Factors in Risk PerceptionRisk Analysis, 2000
- Trust, Emotion, Sex, Politics, and Science: Surveying the Risk‐Assessment BattlefieldRisk Analysis, 1999
- Risk assessment A note on F—n curves, expected numbers of fatalities, and weighted indicators of riskJournal of Hazardous Materials, 1998
- A multi-level, multi-stage and multi-attribute perspective on risk assessment, decision-making and risk controlRisk Decision and Policy, 1996
- Criteria for acceptability for use with quantitative approaches to fire safetyFire Safety Journal, 1985
- Industrial risksProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 1981