Clinical Trial of Two Inhalation Techniques for Pressurized Aerosols
- 1 May 1980
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of International Medical Research
- Vol. 8 (3) , 217-220
- https://doi.org/10.1177/030006058000800306
Abstract
The clinical effects of a bronchodilator, terbutaline sulphate, were compared after administration in the beginning of the inhalation by means of a standard inhaler and administration by actuating 2 seconds before starting the inhalation by means of an inhaler furnished with a 32 × 100 mm tube. No differences could be seen in the parameters measured-forced vital capacity (FVC), 1-second forced expiratory volume (FEV1), forced mid-expiratory flow (FMF), and oscillatory resistance (R05). The results indicate that when attaching a tube to the standard inhaler co-ordination of inhalation and actuation of the aerosol is not of vital importance.This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- A tube spacer to improve inhalation of drugs from pressurised aerosols.BMJ, 1979
- SURVEY OF THE CLINICAL USE OF PRESSURIZED AEROSOL INHALERS1979
- Long-term comparison of salbutamol powder with salbutamol aerosol in asthmatic out-patientsRespiratory Medicine, 1979
- Drug deposition of pressurized inhalation aerosols I. Influence of actuator tube designInternational Journal of Pharmaceutics, 1978
- Use of pressurised aerosols by asthmatic patients.BMJ, 1976
- Patient error in use of bronchidilator metered aerosols.BMJ, 1976