Role of Utility and Inference in the Evolution of Functional Information
Open Access
- 4 March 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Biosemiotics
- Vol. 2 (1) , 101-115
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-008-9032-2
Abstract
Functional information means an encoded network of functions in living organisms from molecular signaling pathways to an organism’s behavior. It is represented by two components: code and an interpretation system, which together form a self-sustaining semantic closure. Semantic closure allows some freedom between components because small variations of the code are still interpretable. The interpretation system consists of inference rules that control the correspondence between the code and the function (phenotype) and determines the shape of the fitness landscape. The utility factor operates at multiple time scales: short-term selection drives evolution towards higher survival and reproduction rate within a given fitness landscape, and long-term selection favors those fitness landscapes that support adaptability and lead to evolutionary expansion of certain lineages. Inference rules make short-term selection possible by shaping the fitness landscape and defining possible directions of evolution, but they are under control of the long-term selection of lineages. Communication normally occurs within a set of agents with compatible interpretation systems, which I call communication system. Functional information cannot be directly transferred between communication systems with incompatible inference rules. Each biological species is a genetic communication system that carries unique functional information together with inference rules that determine evolutionary directions and constraints. This view of the relation between utility and inference can resolve the conflict between realism/positivism and pragmatism. Realism overemphasizes the role of inference in evolution of human knowledge because it assumes that logic is embedded in reality. Pragmatism substitutes usefulness for truth and therefore ignores the advantage of inference. The proposed concept of evolutionary pragmatism rejects the idea that logic is embedded in reality; instead, inference rules are constructed within each communication system to represent reality, and they evolve towards higher adaptability on a long time scale.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cell Psychology: An Evolutionary Approach to the Symbol-Matter ProblemPublished by Springer Nature ,2012
- Deletion of Ultraconserved Elements Yields Viable MicePLoS Biology, 2007
- Self-organization vs. self-ordering events in life-origin modelsPhysics of Life Reviews, 2006
- Sequence — Evolution — FunctionPublished by Springer Nature ,2003
- Arabidopsis gene knockout: phenotypes wantedPublished by Elsevier ,2001
- The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in EvolutionPublished by World Scientific Pub Co Pte Ltd ,1992
- Self-reproducing systems: structure, niche relations and evolutionBiosystems, 1991
- Knowledge representation in fuzzy logicIEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 1989
- The Theory of MeaningSemiotica, 1982
- A New Factor in EvolutionThe American Naturalist, 1896