DOING POWER
- 1 February 1998
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Gender & Society
- Vol. 12 (1) , 40-60
- https://doi.org/10.1177/089124398012001003
Abstract
Contrapower sexual harassment occurs when the target of harassment possesses greater formal organizational power than the perpetrator. Traditional conceptualizations of power underlying sexual harassment have either focused on location within organizational hierarchies or sociocultural status differences between men and women. We suggest the utility of simultaneously considering the influence of gender, race, and class on power dynamics at organizational, sociocultural, and interpersonal or individual levels. Using qualitative data obtained from 8 focus groups, 20 interviews, and 1 in-depth case study, we examine how gender, race, and class influence varied sources of power available to perpetrators and targets in workplace contrapower situations. We argue that the exploration of the dynamics involved in contrapower sexual harassment can illuminate broader processes of doing gender and power in the workplace.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- DOING DIFFERENCEGender & Society, 1995
- BOUNDARY LINESGender & Society, 1994
- Sexual harassment and college faculty membersDeviant Behavior, 1994
- NOW THAT WE ARE HERE:Gender & Society, 1993
- HIERARCHIES, JOBS, BODIES:Gender & Society, 1990
- SOCIAL LOCATION AND GENDER-ROLE ATTITUDES:Gender & Society, 1988
- Doing GenderGender & Society, 1987
- Comment on Crocker's "An Analysis of University Definitions of Sexual Harassment"Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 1984
- Sexual Harassment at Work: Three Explanatory ModelsJournal of Social Issues, 1982
- Sources of Power of Lower Participants in Complex OrganizationsAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1962