Responses of three mouse species to deterrent chemicals in the monarch butterfly. I. Taste and toxicity tests using artificial diets laced with digitoxin or monocrotaline
- 1 December 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Chemoecology
- Vol. 1 (3-4) , 114-123
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01241652
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Exaptation as an Alternative to Coevolution in the Cardenolide-Based Chemical Defense of Monarch Butterflies (Danaus plexippus L.) against Avian PredatorsPublished by Elsevier ,1988
- Social influences on the identification of toxic foods by Norway ratsLearning & Behavior, 1987
- Insects pharmacophagously utilizing defensive plant chemicals (Pyrrolizidine alkaloids)The Science of Nature, 1986
- FORAGING DYNAMICS OF BIRD PREDATORS ON OVERWINTERING MONARCH BUTTERFLIES IN MEXICOEvolution, 1985
- Adult-obtained pyrrolizidine alkaloids defend ithomiine butterflies against a spider predatorNature, 1984
- CHEMISTRY, DEFENSE, AND SURVIVAL: CASE STUDIES AND SELECTED TOPICSPublished by Elsevier ,1980
- Pyrrolizidine alkaloids inDanaus plexippus L. andDanaus chrysippus L.Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 1976
- Localization of Heart Poisons in the Monarch ButterflyScience, 1975
- Improved preparation of tertiary amine N-oxidesThe Journal of Organic Chemistry, 1970
- Species differences in taste preferences.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1956