A method for α‐helical integral membrane protein fold prediction
- 1 March 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Proteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics
- Vol. 18 (3) , 281-294
- https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.340180309
Abstract
Integral membrane proteins (of the α‐helical class) are of central importance in a wide variety of vital cellular functions. Despite considerable effort on methods to predict the location of the helices, little attention has been directed toward developing an automatic method to pack the helices together. In principle, the prediction of membrane proteins should be easier than the prediction of globular proteins: there is only one type of secondary structure and all helices pack with a common alignment across the membrane. This allows all possible structures to be represented on a simple lattice and exhaustively enumerated. Prediction success lies not in generating many possible folds but in recognizing which corresponds to the native. Our evaluation of each fold is based on how well the exposed surface predicted from a multiple sequence alignment fits its allocated position. Just as exposure to solvent in globular proteins can be predicted from sequence variation, so exposure to lipid can be recognized by variable‐hydrophobic (variphobic) positions. Application to both bacteriorhodopsin and the eukaryotic rhodopsin/opsin families revealed that the angular size of the lipid‐exposed faces must be predicted accurately to allow selection of the correct fold. With the inherent uncertainties in helix prediction and parameter choice, this accuracy could not be guaranteed but the correct fold was typically found in the top six candidates. Our method provides the first completely automatic method that can proceed from a scan of the protein sequence databanks to a predicted three‐dimensional structure with no intervention required from the investigator. Within the limited domain of the seven helix bundle proteins, a good chance can be given of selecting the correct structure. However, the limited number of sequences available with a corresponding known structure makes further characterization of the method difficult. © 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Protein fold refinement: building models from idealized folds using motif constraints and multiple sequence dataProtein Engineering, Design and Selection, 1993
- Modeling α‐helical transmembrane domains: The calculation and use of substitution tables for lipid‐facing residuesProtein Science, 1993
- A new approach to protein fold recognitionNature, 1992
- Membrane protein structure predictionJournal of Molecular Biology, 1992
- The semiotics of chargeNature, 1991
- Model for the structure of bacteriorhodopsin based on high-resolution electron cryo-microscopyJournal of Molecular Biology, 1990
- Hydrophobic Organization of Membrane ProteinsScience, 1989
- An analysis of the periodicity of conserved residues in sequence alignments of G‐protein coupled receptorsFEBS Letters, 1989
- Analysis and prediction of the packing of α-helices against a β-sheet in the tertiary structure of globular proteinsJournal of Molecular Biology, 1982
- Analysis and prediction of protein β-sheet structures by a combinatorial approachNature, 1980