Nonparametric Model Discrimination in International Relations
- 1 February 2003
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Conflict Resolution
- Vol. 47 (1) , 72-93
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002702239512
Abstract
This study introduces a simple nonparametric test for the relative discrimination of models in international relations research. The common parametric approach, the Vuong test, does not perform well under the small-n, high canonical correlation conditions that are sometimes encountered in world politics research. The nonparametric approach outperforms the Vuong test in Monte Carlo experiments and is trivial to implement even for the most complicated models. The method is applied to two empirical examples: the debate over long cycles and the effect of domestic politics on foreign policy decision making.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Testing Nonnested Models of International Relations: Reevaluating RealismAmerican Journal of Political Science, 2001
- Democracy, War Initiation, and VictoryAmerican Political Science Review, 1998
- The Duration of Interstate Wars, 1816–1985American Political Science Review, 1996
- Global Political Order, Economic Change, and Armed Conflict: Coevolving Systems and the Use of ForceAmerican Political Science Review, 1996
- Nonparametric Selection of Regressors: The Nonnested CaseEconometrica, 1996
- The Escalation of Great Power Militarized Disputes: Testing Rational Deterrence Theory and Structural RealismAmerican Political Science Review, 1993
- Testing Nonnested ModelsAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1993
- Likelihood Ratio Tests for Model Selection and Non-Nested HypothesesEconometrica, 1989
- Estimating the Dimension of a ModelThe Annals of Statistics, 1978
- On Information and SufficiencyThe Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1951