Measuring Coverage in MNCH: Testing the Validity of Women's Self-Report of Key Maternal and Newborn Health Interventions during the Peripartum Period in Mozambique
Open Access
- 7 May 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 8 (5) , e60694
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060694
Abstract
As low-income countries strive to meet targets for Millennium Development Goals 4 and 5, there is growing need to track coverage and quality of high-impact peripartum interventions. At present, nationally representative household surveys conducted in low-income settings primarily measure contact with the health system, shedding little light on content or quality of care. The objective of this study is to validate the ability of women in Mozambique to report on facility-based care they and their newborns received during labor and one hour postpartum. The study involved household interviews with women in Mozambique whose births were observed eight to ten months previously as part of a survey of the quality of maternal and newborn care at government health facilities. Of 487 women whose births were observed and who agreed to a follow-up interview, 304 were interviewed (62.4%). The validity of 34 indicators was tested using two measures: area under receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) and inflation factor (IF); 27 indicators had sufficient numbers for robust analysis, of which four met acceptability criteria for both (AUC >0.6 and 0.75<IF<1.25). Two of these indicators are considered high demand and are recommended for incorporation into international survey programs: presence of a support person during labor/delivery and placement of the newborn skin to skin against the mother. Nine indicators met acceptability criteria for one of the validity measures. All 13 indicators are recommended for use in in-depth maternal/newborn health surveys. Women are able to report on some aspects of peripartum care. Larger studies may be able to validate some indicators that this study could not assess due to the sample size. Future qualitative research may assist in improving question formulation for some indicators. Studies of similar design in other low-income settings are needed to confirm these results.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measuring Coverage in MNCH: A Validation Study Linking Population Survey Derived Coverage to Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health Care Records in Rural ChinaPLOS ONE, 2013
- Measuring Coverage in MNCH: Indicators for Global Tracking of Newborn CarePLoS Medicine, 2013
- The Reliability of Patient-Reported Pregnancy Outcome DataPopulation Health Management, 2010
- Perinatal factors reported by mothers: do they agree with medical records?European Journal of Epidemiology, 2008
- Reducing Bias from Test Misclassification in Burden of Disease Studies: Use of Test to Actual Positive Ratio – New Test ParameterCroatian Medical Journal, 2008
- Factors affecting a mother's recall of her baby's birth weightInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2005
- A validation study of maternal self reports of obstetrical complications: implications for health surveysInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 1998
- Obstetric and Perinatal EventsClinical Pediatrics, 1992
- The Birth of a First Child: Do Women's Reports Change Over Time?Birth, 1985