Unilateral Versus Bilateral Internal Mammary Revascularization
- 1 November 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 92 (9) , 8-13
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.92.9.8
Abstract
Background The influence of unilateral (UL) and bilateral (BL) mammary artery revascularization, within age groups ≤60 years and >60 years, on patient survival, ischemic-related events, and interventional management was studied in 1142 patients who had coronary artery bypass graft surgery between 1984 and 1992. Methods and Results UL revascularization was performed in 765 (67%) and BL in 377 (33%) patients with supplemental vein grafts. The overall early and hospital mortality rate was 2.7%. For UL in the age group ≤60 years, it was 1.1%; for BL ≤60 years, 1.3% ( P =NS); for UL >60 years, 4.3%; and for BL >60 years, 2.8% ( P =NS). Twenty-five preoperative patient characteristics representing demographics, extent of disease, concomitant disease, ventricular dysfunction, previous surgery, and status did not differentiate the patient groups ( P =NS). Patient survival at 5 years was not different: 94% for UL ≤60 years, 95% for BL ≤60 years, 91% for UL >60 years, and 86% for BL >60 years ( P =NS). The freedom from ischemic-related events was not different at 5 years ( P =NS). The freedom from recurrent angina was 78% for UL ≤60 years, 88% for BL ≤60 years, 82% for UL >60 years, and 83% for BL >60 years ( P = NS). The myocardial infarction freedom was 98% for UL ≤60 years, 96% for BL ≤60 years, 99% for UL >60 years, and 97% for BL >60 years ( P =NS). The freedom from sudden unexpected death and cardiac death did not differentiate the groups ( P =NS). The freedom from angioplasty and reoperation did not differentiate the groups ( P =NS). The freedom from all ischemic-related and interventional events was 76% for UL ≤60 years, 84% for BL ≤60 years, 81% for UL >60 years, and 79% for BL >60 years ( P =NS). A trend exists for less angina pectoris in the bilateral population ≤60 years, which reflects in the trend in the freedom from overall events. Conclusions UL and BL mammary artery revascularizations have the same early mortality regardless of age but do not reveal any advantage for BL revascularization at 5 to 7 years.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cardiac reoperation in patients with bilateral internal thoracic artery graftsThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1994
- Impact of internal mammary artery conduits on operative mortality in coronary revascularizationThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1994
- Is the internal thoracic artery the conduit of choice to replace a stenotic vein graft?The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1994
- Routine use of the left internal mammary artery graft in the elderlyThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1990
- Seventeen-year experience with bilateral internal mammary artery graftsThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1990
- Risks of bilateral internal mammary artery bypass graftingThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1990
- Results of internal thoracic artery grafting over 15 years: Single versus double graftsThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1990
- Sternal wound complications after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting: Early and late mortality, morbidity, and cost of careThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1990
- Factors influencing long-term (10-year to 15-year) survival after a successful coronary artery bypass operationThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1989
- Influence of the Internal-Mammary-Artery Graft on 10-Year Survival and Other Cardiac EventsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986