Overdiagnosis in publicly organised mammography screening programmes: systematic review of incidence trends
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 9 July 2009
- Vol. 339 (jul09 1) , b2587
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2587
Abstract
Objective To estimate the extent of overdiagnosis (the detection of cancers that will not cause death or symptoms) in publicly organised screening programmes.Design Systematic review of published trends in incidence of breast cancer before and after the introduction of mammography screening.Data sources PubMed (April 2007), reference lists, and authors.Review methods One author extracted data on incidence of breast cancer (including carcinoma in situ), population size, screening uptake, time periods, and age groups, which were checked independently by the other author. Linear regression was used to estimate trends in incidence before and after the introduction of screening and in older, previously screened women. Meta-analysis was used to estimate the extent of overdiagnosis.Results Incidence data covering at least seven years before screening and seven years after screening had been fully implemented, and including both screened and non-screened age groups, were available from the United Kingdom; Manitoba, Canada; New South Wales, Australia; Sweden; and parts of Norway. The implementation phase with its prevalence peak was excluded and adjustment made for changing background incidence and compensatory drops in incidence among older, previously screened women. Overdiagnosis was estimated at 52% (95% confidence interval 46% to 58%). Data from three countries showed a drop in incidence as the women exceeded the age limit for screening, but the reduction was small and the estimate of overdiagnosis was compensated for in this review.Conclusions The increase in incidence of breast cancer was closely related to the introduction of screening and little of this increase was compensated for by a drop in incidence of breast cancer in previously screened women. One in three breast cancers detected in a population offered organised screening is overdiagnosed.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Are benefits and harms in mammography screening given equal attention in scientific articles? A cross-sectional studyBMC Medicine, 2007
- Overdiagnosis, Sojourn Time, and Sensitivity in the Copenhagen Mammography Screening ProgramThe Breast Journal, 2006
- Breast cancer incidence after the introduction of mammography screeningCancer, 2006
- Population-based Mammography Screening and Breast Cancer Incidence in New South Wales, AustraliaCancer Causes & Control, 2006
- Increased incidence of invasive breast cancer after the introduction of service screening with mammography in SwedenInternational Journal of Cancer, 2005
- Breast cancer incidence: what do the figures mean?Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 2005
- Mammographic Screening Is Dramatically Changing Age-Incidence Data for Breast CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2004
- Incidence of breast cancer in Norway and Sweden during introduction of nationwide screening: prospective cohort studyBMJ, 2004
- Risks and Benefits of Estrogen Plus Progestin in Healthy Postmenopausal Women: Principal Results From the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Controlled TrialJAMA, 2002
- Mammographic screening and mortality from breast cancer: the Malmo mammographic screening trial.BMJ, 1988