What Accounts for the Changes in U.S. Fiscal Policy Transmission?
- 20 September 2008
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Money, Credit and Banking
- Vol. 40 (7) , 1439-1470
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4616.2008.00166.x
Abstract
Using vector autoregressions on U.S. time series for 1957–79 and 1983–2004, we find government spending shocks to have stronger effects on output, consumption, and wages in the earlier period. We try to account for this observation within a DSGE model featuring price rigidities and limited asset market participation. Specifically, we estimate the structural parameters of the model for both periods by matching impulse responses. Model‐based counterfactual experiments suggest that most of the changes in fiscal policy transmission are accounted for by increased asset market participation and the more active monetary policy of the Volcker–Greenspan period.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Has Monetary Policy Become More Effective?The Review of Economics and Statistics, 2006
- Nominal Rigidities and the Dynamic Effects of a Shock to Monetary PolicyJournal of Political Economy, 2005
- Estimating the Effects of Fiscal Policy in OECD CountriesSSRN Electronic Journal, 2004
- Recent U.S. Macroeconomic Stability: Good Policies, Good Practices, or Good Luck?The Review of Economics and Statistics, 2004
- Fiscal Policy in the New Neoclassical SynthesisJournal of Money, Credit and Banking, 2003
- Limited Asset Market Participation and the Elasticity of Intertemporal SubstitutionJournal of Political Economy, 2002
- Interest Rates and InflationAmerican Economic Review, 2001
- Monetary Policy Rules and Macroeconomic Stability: Evidence and Some Theory*The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2000
- The Behavior of U. S. Public Debt and DeficitsThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1998
- Nominal price rigidity, money supply endogeneity, and business cyclesJournal of Monetary Economics, 1996