Implementation of Reference Systems in Laboratory Medicine
- 1 December 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Clinical Chemistry
- Vol. 46 (12) , 1907-1909
- https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/46.12.1907
Abstract
In laboratory medicine, meaningful measurements are essential for the diagnosis, risk assessment, treatment, and follow-up of patients; therefore, methods applied in diagnostic measurements must be accurate, precise, specific, and comparable among laboratories (1). A given analytical measurement has only one true result, and the reliability of a measurement lies both in the result obtained and in the performance of a well-defined measurement procedure. Inadequate or incorrect analytical performance has consequences for the patient, the clinician, and the healthcare system. Poor-quality laboratory results may lead to incorrect interpretation by the physician, to a wrong diagnosis, and hence to treatment that impairs, or at least does not help, the patient’s situation.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Metrology in laboratory medicine - A necessityAccreditation and Quality Assurance, 1999
- ConferenceClinical Biochemistry, 1998
- Traceability to the SI of amount-of-substance measurements: from ignoring to realizing, a chemist's viewMetrologia, 1997
- Accuracy in clinical chemistry--does anybody care?Clinical Chemistry, 1994
- Proficiency Testing Linked to the National Reference System for the Clinical Laboratory: a Proposal for Achieving AccuracyClinical Chemistry, 1992