Effect of regression to the mean in the presence of within‐subject variability
- 1 August 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 10 (8) , 1295-1302
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780100812
Abstract
Regression to the mean arises often in statistical applications where the units chosen for study relate to some observed characteristic in the extreme of its distribution. Gardner and Heady attribute the effect of regression to the mean to measurement errors. They assume the modelYi = U + ei, where U is a fixed within-subject component and ei is the random measurement error. They suggest several replicate measurements to reduce the regression effect under the assumption that the measurement errors ei are independent within subjects. While measurement errors play an important role in regression to the mean, one should not overlook within-subject variation. In this paper, we consider a model to estimate the regression effect in the presence of correlated within-subject effects as well as independent measurement errors.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Regression Toward the Mean and the Paired Sample t TestThe American Statistician, 1991
- Regression: A New Mode for an Old Meaning?The American Statistician, 1990
- Estimating Treatment Effects in Clinical Trials Subject to Regression to the MeanBiometrics, 1985
- Regression to the modeStatistica Neerlandica, 1983
- THE EFFECT OF REGRESSION TO THE MEAN IN EPIDEMIOLOGIC AND CLINICAL STUDIESAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1976
- Some effects of within-person variability in epidemiological studiesJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1973
- Regression toward the Mean in Uncontrolled Clinical StudiesBiometrics, 1973
- Serum cholesterol changes: Effects of diet and regression toward the meanJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1972