The Pacific Basin versus the Atlantic Alliance: Two Paradigms of International Relations
- 1 September 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
- Vol. 505 (1) , 34-45
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716289505001003
Abstract
For many years, the study of international economy and international security, two fields of international relations, has been based respectively upon the two concepts of international liberalism and extended deterrence. Both concepts developed out of the conditions of the Atlantic/European arena after World War II; together they form the Atlantic Alliance paradigm. This paradigm poorly fits the Pacific/Asian world. In regard to the international economy, the East Asian states are adherents not of international liberalism but of international mercantilism. In regard to international security, they are cases not of extended deterrence but of finite deterrence. Together, these concepts form the Pacific Basin paradigm. The 1990s will be a period of conflict between these two international relations paradigms, the declining one of the United States and the American half century and the rising one of the East Asian powers and the future.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Changing Concepts of Doctrine, Strategy and Operations in the Chinese People's Liberation Army 1978–87The China Quarterly, 1987
- The origins and development of the Northeast Asian political economy: industrial sectors, product cycles, and political consequencesInternational Organization, 1984
- The political consequences of the product cycle: industrial history and political outcomesInternational Organization, 1979
- The Political Economy of Foreign InvestmentPublished by Springer Nature ,1975