Early generation selection in wheat. I. Yield potential
- 1 January 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by CSIRO Publishing in Australian Journal of Agricultural Research
- Vol. 40 (6) , 1117-1133
- https://doi.org/10.1071/ar9891117
Abstract
F3 single plant traits were tested as possible selection criteria for increasing yield potential. F3 plants were grown spaced in a glasshouse, while yield was measured in southern New South Wales under irrigation and optimum management. Thc population studied comprised 220 F1-derived lines taken at random from a multiple convergent cross amongst 16 parents representing elite CTMMYT germplasm of the mid 1970s but containing diversity for major dwarfing genes, maturity, leaf angle and other traits. More than 50 traits were determined, comprising numerical components of yield, size and morphology, partitioning ratios, development rates and physiological activities. All F3 traits showed significant genotypic variation which was usually greater for progeny lines than for parents although only occasionally significantly so. Broad sense heritability was generally moderate to high.F3 lines were advanced by single seed descent for replicated F7 and F8 yield experiments, two in each of 1982 and 1983. In each experiment 60-68 progeny lines chosen at random were tested; 44 lines were common to all experiments. Plot size was 8 rows X 5 m, and edge rows and plot ends were discarded. Yield levels were high (mean yield 5.9 t h a 1 at 10Yo moisture) and largely free of interference from lodging and disease. The progeny main effect on grain yield was highly significant, but no progeny line significantly outyielded the best parent. Best correlations with progeny grain yield were given by F3 plant height (r= -0.31 to -0.50 across experiments), F3 kernel weight (r= -0.03 to -0.44), F3 harvest index (r = 0.18 to 0.5 l), F3 leaf angle (r = -0.13 to -0.40, erect leaves favouring high yicld) and F3 spike number (r=0.08 to 0.40). Retrospective selection in F3 using these traits singly at a selection intensity of 25% gave increases in population mean yield (0 to + 12%) and in the proportion of high yielding lines (doubled in some cases), but only selection in F3 for reduced stature is considered worthwhile for advancing yield potential. It is suggested that the ineffectiveness of F3 selection is largely due to genotype by environment interaction, along with the complex multigenic nature of grain yicld.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Random Intermating Before Selection in Spring Wheat 1Crop Science, 1984
- Practical implication of improving the precision of genotype assessment in selection ? A theoryEuphytica, 1983
- Changes in Leaf Photosynthesis With Plant Ontogeny and Relationships With Yield Per Ear in Wheat Cultivars and 120 ProgenyFunctional Plant Biology, 1983
- EFFECTIVENESS OF SEVERAL SELECTION METHODS FOR GRAIN YIELD IN TWO F2 POPULATIONS OF SPRING WHEATCanadian Journal of Plant Science, 1982
- A classification of the NORIN 10 and Tom Thumb dwarfing genes in British, Mexican, Indian and other hexaploid bread wheat varietiesEuphytica, 1981
- Leaf Photosynthesis, Leaf Permeability, Crop Growth, and Yield of Short Spring Wheat Genotypes Under Irrigation1Crop Science, 1981
- HARVEST INDEX AS A SELECTION CRITERION FOR GRAIN YIELD IN TWO SPRING WHEAT CROSSES GROWN AT TWO POPULATION DENSITIESCanadian Journal of Plant Science, 1980
- Breeding Methodology in Wheat. I. Determination of Characters Measured on F 2 Spaced Plants for Yield Selection in Spring Wheat 1Crop Science, 1980
- Selection for Yield and Yield Components in Wheat1Crop Science, 1978
- Response to two-way selection for harvest index in two wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) crossesAustralian Journal of Agricultural Research, 1977