Evaluation of the HemoCue® for measuring intra‐operative haemoglobin concentrations: a comparison with the Coulter Max‐M®
- 6 April 1998
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in Anaesthesia
- Vol. 53 (4) , 349-352
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2044.1998.00328.x
Abstract
We compared haemoglobin concentration values obtained using a portable haemoglobinometer, the HemoCue, in the operating theatre with the results obtained by the Coulter Max-M in the laboratory. Haemoglobin concentrations were measured on 52 arterial blood samples obtained from 13 patients during aortic surgery, in theatre with the HemoCue and again by the Coulter Max-M. Twenty routine samples from the laboratory were also analysed by both methods. There was no significant difference between results, with a mean of 10.94 gdl−1 and 10.90 gdl−1 for the HemoCue and Coulter, respectively (p = 0.12, t = −1.99, df = 70). The limits of agreement of the two methods (mean difference ± 2 SD) were −0.37 and +0.45 gdl−1. The coefficients of repeatability of the 20 samples analysed in duplicate on each device were 0.26 gdl−1 and 0.33 gdl−1, respectively. The coefficients of variance were 0.74% (HemoCue) and 0.93% (Coulter). With adequate training and monitoring, the HemoCue provides comparable haemoglobin results for near-patient testing in theatre.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Protocol for evaluation of automated blood cell countersClinical and Laboratory Haematology, 2008
- Is a hemoglobin of 10 g/dL required for surgery?Medical Clinics of North America, 1993
- Disturbance of the determination of hemoglobin concentration in patients with high leukocyte counts.Clinical Chemistry, 1989
- Evaluation of portable haemoglobinometer in general practice.BMJ, 1987
- Evaluation of "HemoCue," a new device for determining hemoglobin.Clinical Chemistry, 1986
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986