Electrical Silencing of PDF Neurons Advances the Phase of non-PDF Clock Neurons in Drosophila
- 1 April 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Biological Rhythms
- Vol. 23 (2) , 117-128
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0748730407312984
Abstract
Drosophila clock neurons exhibit self-sustaining cellular oscillations that rely in part on rhythmic transcriptional feedback loops. We have previously determined that electrical silencing of the pigment dispersing factor (PDF)-expressing lateral-ventral (LNV) pacemaker subset of fly clock neurons via expression of an inward-rectifier K+ channel (Kir2.1) severely disrupts free-running rhythms of locomotor activity—most flies are arrhythmic and those that are not exhibit weak short-period rhythms—and abolishes LNV molecular oscillation in constant darkness. PDF is known to be an important LNV output signal. Here we examine the effects of electrical silencing of the LNV pacemakers on molecular rhythms in other, nonsilenced, subsets of clock neurons. In contrast to previously described cell-autonomous abolition of free-running molecular rhythms, we find that electrical silencing of the LNV pacemakers via Kir2.1 expression does not impair molecular rhythms in LND, DN1, and DN2 subsets of clock neurons. However, free-running molecular rhythms in these non-LNV clock neurons occur with advanced phase. Electrical silencing of LNVs phenocopies PDF null mutation ( pdf 01 ) at both behavioral and molecular levels except for the complete abolition of free-running cellular oscillation in the LNVs themselves. LNV electrically silenced or pdf 01 flies exhibit weak free-running behavioral rhythms with short period, and the molecular oscillation in non-LNV neurons phase advances in constant darkness. That LN V electrical silencing leads to the same behavioral and non-LN V molecular phenotypes as pdf 01 suggests that persistence of LNV molecular oscillation in pdf 01 flies has no functional effect, either on behavioral rhythms or on non-LNV molecular rhythms. We thus conclude that functionally relevant signals from LNVs to non-LNV clock neurons and other downstream targets rely both on PDF signaling and LNV electrical activity, and that LN Vs do not ordinarily send functionally relevant signals via PDF-independent mechanisms.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Electrophysiological and Anatomical Characterization of PDF-Positive Clock Neurons in the Intact Adult Drosophila BrainJournal of Neurophysiology, 2006
- A resetting signal between Drosophila pacemakers synchronizes morning and evening activityNature, 2005
- A G Protein-Coupled Receptor, groom-of-PDF, Is Required for PDF Neuron Action in Circadian BehaviorNeuron, 2005
- Drosophila GPCR Han Is a Receptor for the Circadian Clock Neuropeptide PDFNeuron, 2005
- PDF Receptor Signaling in Drosophila Contributes to Both Circadian and Geotactic BehaviorsNeuron, 2005
- Morning and evening peaks of activity rely on different clock neurons of the Drosophila brainNature, 2004
- Membrane electrical excitability is necessary for the free‐running larval Drosophila circadian clockJournal of Neurobiology, 2004
- Drosophila Free-Running Rhythms Require Intercellular CommunicationPLoS Biology, 2003
- Molecular Components of the Circadian System in DrosophilaAnnual Review of Physiology, 2001
- Loss of Circadian Behavioral Rhythms and per RNA Oscillations in the Drosophila Mutant timelessScience, 1994