Which Should it Be Called: Convergent Validity or Discriminant Validity?
- 1 June 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport
- Vol. 71 (2) , 190-194
- https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2000.10608897
Abstract
(2000). Which Should it Be Called: Convergent Validity or Discriminant Validity? Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport: Vol. 71, No. 2, pp. 190-194.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Curl-Up Testing in College Students: Validity and Practicality of a Field Test—A Reply to Zhu's (1998) CommentaryResearch Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 1998
- Comments on “Development of a Cadence Curl-Up Test for College Students” (Sparling, Millard-Stafford, & Snow, 1997): Concerns about Validity and PracticalityResearch Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 1998
- Development of a Cadence Curl-Up Test for College StudentsResearch Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 1997
- Confirmatory Factor Analyses of Multitrait-Multimethod Data: A Comparison of Alternative ModelsApplied Psychological Measurement, 1991
- Reliability of a Modification of the Health-Related Physical Fitness Test for Use with Physical Education MajorsResearch Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 1990
- Evaluation of Criteria Associated with Abdominal Fitness TestingResearch Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 1987
- Methodology Review: Analysis of Multitrait-Multimethod MatricesApplied Psychological Measurement, 1986
- A Sampling Model for ValidityApplied Psychological Measurement, 1982
- Analyzing The Multitrait-Multimethod MatrixMultivariate Behavioral Research, 1978
- Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.Psychological Bulletin, 1959